방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 가법 비율 평가× | 2단계 정규화를 고려한 대안 순위 결정 방법× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 의사결정 | 의사결정 |
| 계열 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2010 | 2022 |
| 창시자≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. |
| 유형≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation |
| 원전≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗ |
| 별칭 | — | — |
| 관련 | 8 | 8 |
| 요약≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|