ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Anticipatory Governance Analysis×Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment×
분야Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20082013
창시자David H. Guston, Daniel Barben, Erik Fisher, Cynthia SelinJack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, Phil Macnaghten
유형Governance framework and analytic approach for emerging technologiesNormative governance and reflexive-assessment process
원전Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218-242. DOI ↗Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI ↗
별칭Anticipatory governance framework, Foresight-engagement-integration analysis, Reflexive technology governanceRRI assessment, Responsible innovation framework, AIRR assessment
관련44
요약Anticipatory governance is a framework for steering emerging technologies—nanotechnology, synthetic biology, AI—while their trajectories are still open, rather than waiting to react to harms after they have hardened. Developed by David Guston and colleagues at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University, it defines anticipatory governance as a broad societal capacity, distributed across the research enterprise and the public, built from three intertwined components: foresight, public engagement, and integration. The aim is not to predict the future but to build the reflexive capacity to imagine plausible futures and act on them wisely in the present.Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) assessment is an approach to governing science and innovation that asks not only whether a technology works but whether it is desirable, and seeks to align research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The influential Stilgoe-Owen-Macnaghten framework operationalises this through four dimensions—anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness (AIRR)—that are built into the innovation process so that direction and purpose, not just risk and product, become objects of deliberate care.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Anticipatory Governance Analysis · Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare