방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Angoff Standard Setting× | 문항 반응 이론 (IRT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | Education | 심리측정학 |
| 계열≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1971 | 1952–1968 |
| 창시자≠ | William H. Angoff | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) |
| 유형≠ | Test-centered standard-setting procedure for establishing cut scores | Probabilistic measurement model |
| 원전≠ | Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820 | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | Angoff Method, Modified Angoff Method, Yes/No Angoff, Angoff Cut-Score Procedure | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory |
| 관련≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | The Angoff method is a test-centered procedure for establishing a passing score (cut score) on an examination. A panel of content experts conceptualizes a 'borderline' or minimally competent examinee and, for each item, estimates the probability that such an examinee would answer it correctly. Summing those probabilities yields a recommended cut score for each panelist, and averaging across panelists and discussion rounds produces the performance standard. It is among the most widely used standard-setting methods in licensure, certification, and K-12 testing. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|