ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

감사에서의 분석 절차×내부 통제 평가×
분야회계학회계학
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도19831992
창시자American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
유형Audit procedure methodologyComprehensive control evaluation framework
원전American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗
별칭Analytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend AnalysisCOSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control Assessment
관련44
요약Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Analytical Procedures in Auditing · Internal Control Evaluation. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare