방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 정확도× | 균형 정확도× | 혼동 행렬× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 모델 평가 | 모델 평가 | 모델 평가 |
| 계열 | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| 기원 연도≠ | 20th century | 2010 | 20th century |
| 창시자≠ | Historical statistical foundations | Brodersen, Ong, Stephan, and Buhmann | Statistical foundations |
| 유형≠ | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric | Evaluation visualization |
| 원전≠ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗ | Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate | Average Recall, Equal-weight Average Sensitivity | Error Matrix, Contingency Table |
| 관련 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. | Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset. | The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|
|