Sibling Fixed-Effects Design
The sibling fixed-effects, or sibling-comparison, design controls for everything that siblings share by construction. Genes (on average half), parents, household income, neighborhood, schooling, and family culture are differenced out when you compare brothers or sisters who differ in an exposure, so the residual within-family association is purged of all confounders common to the family. D'Onofrio, Lahey, Turkheimer, and Lichtenstein championed these family-based quasi-experiments as a way to integrate genetic and social-science research by rigorously testing competing causal hypotheses. Frisell and colleagues, however, gave the design its essential warning label: precisely because shared confounding is removed, the within-family estimate is unusually vulnerable to the confounders siblings do not share and to attenuation from measurement error. The design is powerful but double-edged.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Frisell, T., Oberg, S., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Sjolander, A. (2012). Sibling Comparison Designs: Bias From Non-Shared Confounders and Measurement Error. Epidemiology, 23(5), 713-720. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31825fa230 ↗
- D'Onofrio, B. M., Lahey, B. B., Turkheimer, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013). Critical Need for Family-Based, Quasi-Experimental Designs in Integrating Genetic and Social Science Research. American Journal of Public Health, 103(S1), S46-S55. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301252 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Sibling-Comparison (Within-Family Fixed-Effects) Design for Shared Familial Confounding. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/social-epidemiology/sibling-fixed-effects-design
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Chains-of-Risk ModelSocial Epidemiology↔ 比較
- E-Value Sensitivity AnalysisSocial Epidemiology↔ 比較
- Life-Course EpidemiologySocial Epidemiology↔ 比較
- Negative Control Outcome DesignSocial Epidemiology↔ 比較