Electoral System Analysis
Electoral system analysis examines how the rules for translating votes into seats shape the proportionality of representation and the format of the party system. Maurice Duverger's 1954 work established the foundational propositions — that single-member plurality tends toward two-party competition while proportional representation favors multipartism — through the joint operation of a mechanical effect (how the seat-allocation rule itself distorts the vote) and a psychological effect (how voters and elites anticipate that rule and behave strategically). Rein Taagepera and Matthew Shugart (1989) put the field on a quantitative footing by showing how district magnitude and other parameters systematically determine outcomes, and Arend Lijphart (1994) provided the major comparative study of disproportionality and party systems across democracies. The method reads electoral rules as a powerful, designed lever over the structure of political competition.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Wiley. ISBN: 9780416683202
- Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198273479
- Taagepera, R., & Shugart, M. S. (1989). Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300041798
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Electoral System Analysis (Mechanical and Psychological Effects). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/political-economy/electoral-system-analysis
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Effective Number of PartiesPolitical Economy↔ 比較
- Gallagher Disproportionality IndexPolitical Economy↔ 比較
- Political Cleavage AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ 比較