TREC Pooling and Relevance Judgments
Pooling is the technique that lets the Cranfield evaluation paradigm scale to collections of millions of documents, where judging every document for every topic is impossible. Developed and institutionalized at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology for the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), pooling gathers the top-ranked documents returned by many participating systems for each topic, merges them into a single pool, has human assessors judge only that pool, and treats every unjudged document as non-relevant. The result is a reusable test collection — documents, topics, and pooled relevance judgments (qrels) — on which new systems can later be scored without further assessment. Pooling is what made large-scale, reproducible retrieval evaluation feasible.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
- Cleverdon, C. W. (1967). The Cranfield tests on index language devices. Aslib Proceedings, 19(6), 173-194. DOI: 10.1108/eb050097 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). TREC Pooling and Relevance Judgments (Scalable Construction of Reusable Test Collections). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/library-information-science/trec-pooling-relevance-judgments
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Cranfield Evaluation ParadigmLibrary Information Science↔ 比較
- Query Expansion EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ 比較
- Relevance Feedback EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ 比較