Query Expansion Evaluation
Query expansion evaluation measures whether adding terms to a user's query — drawn from a thesaurus, from corpus co-occurrence statistics, or from relevance or pseudo-relevance feedback — actually improves retrieval. Expansion attacks the vocabulary-mismatch problem, where relevant documents use words the searcher did not, and it tends to raise recall by bringing in synonymous and related terms. But it can also lower precision by introducing ambiguity, and it can help some queries while badly hurting others. Sound evaluation therefore reports not just the average effectiveness change but the recall-precision trade-off and a robustness analysis of how many individual queries were helped versus harmed.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
- Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1990). Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 288-297. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199006)41:4<288::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
- Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Query Expansion Evaluation (Measuring the Effect of Term Addition on Retrieval). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/library-information-science/query-expansion-evaluation
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Cranfield Evaluation ParadigmLibrary Information Science↔ 比較
- Relevance Feedback EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ 比較
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ 比較