手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 合成コントロール法(SCM)× | 因果推論のための操作変数(IV)法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 因果推論 | 医療経済学 |
| 系統≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2003–2010 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 提唱者≠ | Alberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal (2003); Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010) | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 種類≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Method |
| 原典≠ | Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 別名 | SCM, synthetic control, synth estimator, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller method | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | The Synthetic Control Method estimates the causal effect of a treatment or policy on a single treated unit by constructing a weighted combination of untreated units — the synthetic control — that closely resembles the treated unit before the intervention. The gap between the treated unit and its synthetic counterpart after the intervention is the estimated treatment effect. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|