手法を比較

	構造化専門的判断（SPJ）フレームワーク：リスク評価のための構造化専門的判断	SAPROF: 暴力リスク評価のための保護要因構造化評価
分野	司法心理学	司法心理学
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2003	2012
提唱者	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws	Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé
種類	Clinician-Synthesized	Clinician-rated
原典	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.	de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief.
別名	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework	SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF
関連	4	4
概要	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.	The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.