ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

短縮版尺度開発×項目応答理論 (IRT)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1990s–2000s1952–1968
提唱者Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002)Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
種類Scale development methodologyProbabilistic measurement model
原典Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
別名scale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodologyIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
関連55
概要Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Short-Form Scale Development · Item Response Theory. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare