ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

短縮版信頼性分析×項目応答理論 (IRT)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1990s–2000s1952–1968
提唱者Conventional practice; codified notably by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) and Stanton et al. (2002)Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
種類Scale development / psychometric evaluationProbabilistic measurement model
原典Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
別名abbreviated scale reliability, short-form validation, scale shortening, item reduction reliabilityIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
関連65
概要Short-form reliability analysis evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale maintains acceptable internal consistency, validity, and structural integrity after items are removed. It is used in survey and assessment research to create briefer instruments that reduce respondent burden without sacrificing measurement quality.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Short-form reliability analysis · Item Response Theory. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare