ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ショートフォーム構成概念妥当性×構成概念妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1990s–2000s1955
提唱者Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteriaLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類Validity assessment / scale shorteningValidity evaluation framework
原典Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
別名abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validationconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
関連66
概要Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ Download slides

ScholarGate手法を比較: Short form construct validity · Construct Validity. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare