手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 感度分析と品質機能展開× | 感度分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 実験計画法 | 意思決定 |
| 系統≠ | Process / pipeline | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 1990s–2000s (integration period) | 2004 |
| 提唱者≠ | Yoji Akao (QFD foundation); sensitivity extension attributed to multiple QFD researchers (1990s–2000s) | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. |
| 種類≠ | Integrated engineering design and decision analysis technique | Robustness wrapper — parameter / weight perturbation sensitivity indices |
| 原典≠ | Fung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., & Wang, D. (2006). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal of Production Research, 44(12), 2483–2504. link ↗ | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Wiley, Chichester DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | SA-QFD, QFD sensitivity analysis, robust QFD, House of Quality sensitivity analysis | — |
| 関連≠ | 2 | 0 |
| 概要≠ | Sensitivity analysis integrated with Quality Function Deployment (QFD) tests how stable the prioritization of engineering characteristics remains when customer requirement weights or relationship matrix scores are varied. By systematically perturbing the inputs of the House of Quality, teams identify which design parameters are truly critical and which rankings would flip under different assumptions — turning QFD from a one-shot prioritization tool into a robust decision framework. | SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS (Sensitivity Analysis — Systematic assessment of output variation w.r.t. input perturbations) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. in 2004. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|