手法を比較

	感度分析統合応答曲面法	中心複合計画法
分野	実験計画法	実験計画法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	1990s–2000s (integration practice)	1951
提唱者	Box & Wilson (RSM, 1951); Saltelli et al. (global SA framework, 1990s–2000s)	George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson
種類	Hybrid experimental-analytical method	Response surface experimental design
原典	Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118916018	Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45.
別名	SA-RSM, RSM with sensitivity analysis, sensitivity-augmented RSM, response surface methodology with factor screening	CCD, Box-Wilson design, central composite response surface design, rotatable central composite design
関連	5	3
概要	Sensitivity analysis-integrated RSM couples a structured experimental design with a formal sensitivity analysis of the fitted response surface model. After estimating a polynomial surrogate from designed experiments, global or local sensitivity indices are computed to quantify each input factor's relative contribution to output variability. This allows practitioners to identify which factors truly drive the response before committing to full optimization, reducing cost and improving the reliability of the final optimum.	Central Composite Design (CCD) is a second-order response surface design that allows researchers to efficiently fit a full quadratic model relating multiple continuous input factors to one or more response variables. Introduced by Box and Wilson in 1951, it combines a factorial (or fractional factorial) core, axial (star) points, and center-point replicates into a single unified design, making it the most widely used design for process optimization in engineering, chemistry, and manufacturing.