手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 教育研究における因果関係の感度分析× | 回帰不連続デザイン(Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 1983–2002 | 2008 |
| 提唱者≠ | Paul R. Rosenbaum (formal framework); applied in education research by Briggs and others | Imbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction) |
| 種類≠ | Causal robustness / bias assessment | Quasi-experimental causal design |
| 原典≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 | Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, causal sensitivity analysis, SA for causal education studies | RDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research tests how robust a quasi-experimental finding is to unmeasured confounding. Rather than assuming all bias has been removed, it quantifies how large a hidden bias would need to be to overturn a causal conclusion — a critical safeguard when randomisation is impossible, which is common in educational settings. | Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|