ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

尺度開発×内容妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1991–19951975
提唱者Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David WatsonC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement
種類Multi-step methodological frameworkValidity evidence / expert judgement procedure
原典DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗
別名questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale buildingcontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation
関連56
概要Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Scale development · Content Validity. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare