手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

尺度開発×構成概念妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1991–19951955
提唱者Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David WatsonLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類Multi-step methodological frameworkValidity evaluation framework
原典DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
別名questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale buildingconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
関連56
概要Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ Download slides

ScholarGate手法を比較: Scale development · Construct Validity. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare