ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

SAPROF: 暴力リスク評価のための保護要因構造化評価×構造化専門的判断(SPJ)フレームワーク:リスク評価のための構造化専門的判断×
分野司法心理学司法心理学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20122003
提唱者Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries RobbéStephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws
種類Clinician-ratedClinician-Synthesized
原典de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press. link ↗
別名SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROFSPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework
関連44
概要The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: SAPROF · SPJ Framework. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare