ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

深遠な不確実性下における最悪ケースとミニマックス後悔評価を用いた頑健シナリオ分析×不確実性下でのロバストなパレート最適解の探索×
分野シミュレーションシミュレーション
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1950 (foundations); 2003 (modern RDM formulation)2006
提唱者Wald, A. (minimax foundation); Lempert et al. (RDM framework)Deb, K. & Gupta, H.
種類Scenario-based robustness evaluationOptimization framework
原典Wald, A. (1950). Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley, New York. link ↗Deb, K., & Gupta, H. (2006). Introducing robustness in multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 14(4), 463–494. DOI ↗
別名RSA, Robust Scenario Planning, Worst-Case Scenario Analysis, Minimax Regret Scenario AnalysisRMOO, Robust MOO, Robust Pareto Optimization, Uncertainty-Robust Multi-Objective Optimization
関連54
概要Robust Scenario Analysis evaluates a set of candidate strategies across a structured collection of plausible future scenarios and selects the strategy that performs acceptably well — or best in the worst case — regardless of which scenario materializes. It merges scenario planning with robustness criteria such as maximin, minimax regret, or satisficing to support decisions under deep, irreducible uncertainty.Robust Multi-Objective Optimization (RMOO) is a framework for finding solutions that simultaneously optimize multiple conflicting objectives while remaining insensitive to perturbations in decision variables or problem parameters. Unlike classical MOO, RMOO explicitly incorporates uncertainty into the optimization loop, producing a robust Pareto front whose members perform well not only at the nominal design point but also across a neighbourhood of plausible operating conditions.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Robust Scenario Analysis · Robust Multi-Objective Optimization. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare