ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

深遠な不確実性下における最悪ケースとミニマックス後悔評価を用いた頑健シナリオ分析×モンテカルロシミュレーション×
分野シミュレーション意思決定
系統Process / pipelineMCDM
提唱年1950 (foundations); 2003 (modern RDM formulation)1949
提唱者Wald, A. (minimax foundation); Lempert et al. (RDM framework)Metropolis, N., Ulam, S.
種類Scenario-based robustness evaluationRobustness wrapper — Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation
原典Wald, A. (1950). Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley, New York. link ↗Metropolis, N., Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association DOI ↗
別名RSA, Robust Scenario Planning, Worst-Case Scenario Analysis, Minimax Regret Scenario Analysis
関連50
概要Robust Scenario Analysis evaluates a set of candidate strategies across a structured collection of plausible future scenarios and selects the strategy that performs acceptably well — or best in the worst case — regardless of which scenario materializes. It merges scenario planning with robustness criteria such as maximin, minimax regret, or satisficing to support decisions under deep, irreducible uncertainty.MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION (Monte Carlo Simulation — Stochastic uncertainty propagation through MCDM model) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Metropolis, N., Ulam, S. in 1949. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Robust Scenario Analysis · MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare