ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ロバスト・ラッシュモデル×ロバスト確証的因子分析×
分野心理測定学統計学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19821984–1994
提唱者Mislevy & Bock (robust ability estimation); broader robust IRT formalized through 1980s–2000sSatorra & Bentler (robust SE/chi-square corrections); Browne (ADF estimator)
種類Robust item calibration modelConfirmatory latent variable model with robust estimation
原典Strobl, C., Wickelmaier, F., & Zeileis, A. (2011). Accounting for individual differences in Bradley-Terry models by means of recursive partitioning. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(2), 135–153. DOI ↗Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗
別名robust IRT Rasch, robust dichotomous Rasch, outlier-resistant Rasch model, robust item calibrationRobust CFA, CFA with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler CFA, non-normal CFA
関連56
概要The robust Rasch model applies the standard one-parameter logistic Rasch framework with estimation procedures designed to limit the influence of outlying item responses, aberrant respondents, or mild model violations, producing stable item and person parameter estimates that are less sensitive to data contamination than ordinary maximum likelihood or conditional maximum likelihood Rasch estimation.Robust confirmatory factor analysis fits a pre-specified factor structure to observed data while correcting standard errors and goodness-of-fit statistics for violations of multivariate normality. It is the preferred variant of CFA whenever Likert-type, skewed, or kurtotic indicators make the classical normal-theory estimator unreliable.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Robust Rasch Model · Robust Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare