ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

頑健パス解析×ロバスト確証的因子分析×
分野統計学統計学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19981984–1994
提唱者Yuan & Bentler (robust SEM/path framework); Huber (M-estimation foundation)Satorra & Bentler (robust SE/chi-square corrections); Browne (ADF estimator)
種類Causal path modeling with robust estimationConfirmatory latent variable model with robust estimation
原典Yuan, K.-H. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Robust mean and covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51(1), 63–88. DOI ↗Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗
別名robust PA, path analysis with robust standard errors, robust causal path modeling, robust structural path modelingRobust CFA, CFA with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler CFA, non-normal CFA
関連66
概要Robust path analysis applies robust estimation — such as sandwich standard errors or M-estimation — to path models that specify directed causal relationships among observed variables. It preserves valid inference about path coefficients and indirect effects when data violate normality, contain outliers, or exhibit heteroscedasticity that would distort conventional standard errors.Robust confirmatory factor analysis fits a pre-specified factor structure to observed data while correcting standard errors and goodness-of-fit statistics for violations of multivariate normality. It is the preferred variant of CFA whenever Likert-type, skewed, or kurtotic indicators make the classical normal-theory estimator unreliable.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Robust Path Analysis · Robust Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare