手法を比較

	ロバストなヌソロジカル妥当性	構成概念妥当性
分野	心理測定学	心理測定学
系統	Latent structure	Latent structure
提唱年	1955	1955
提唱者	Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類	Validity assessment / construct validation	Validity evaluation framework
原典	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
別名	nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
関連	5	6
概要	Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.