手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ロバスト・ミクロシミュレーション× | 感度分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | シミュレーション | 意思決定 |
| 系統≠ | Process / pipeline | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 1990s–2000s | 2004 |
| 提唱者≠ | Briggs, A. H.; O'Brien, B. J. and others in health technology assessment literature | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. |
| 種類≠ | Simulation with systematic robustness testing | Robustness wrapper — parameter / weight perturbation sensitivity indices |
| 原典≠ | O'Brien, B. J., & Briggs, A. H. (2002). Analysis of uncertainty in health care cost-effectiveness studies: an introduction to statistical issues and methods. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11(6), 455-468. DOI ↗ | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Wiley, Chichester DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | Robust Micro-Simulation, Uncertainty-Robust Microsimulation, Probabilistic Microsimulation, Sensitivity-Enhanced Microsimulation | — |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 0 |
| 概要≠ | Robust Microsimulation combines individual-level (micro) simulation with systematic uncertainty analysis — typically probabilistic sensitivity analysis — to generate outputs that are robust to parameter uncertainty, model structure assumptions, and input variability. It is widely used in health technology assessment, public policy, and social science to produce credible, decision-relevant predictions. | SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS (Sensitivity Analysis — Systematic assessment of output variation w.r.t. input perturbations) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. in 2004. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|