手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ロバストな判別妥当性× | 収束的妥当性× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1959 (foundational); 2015 (HTMT criterion) | 1959 |
| 提唱者≠ | Henseler, Ringle & Sarstedt (HTMT); Campbell & Fiske (foundational framework) | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 種類≠ | Validity assessment / measurement quality criterion | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 原典≠ | Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | HTMT criterion, heterotrait-monotrait ratio, discriminant validity testing, RDV | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Robust discriminant validity assessment determines whether distinct latent constructs in a measurement model are sufficiently different from one another. Unlike traditional AVE-based approaches, robust methods such as the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio use the pattern of inter-indicator correlations to provide a more sensitive and simulation-validated criterion for judging discriminant validity in structural equation modeling contexts. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|