ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

検索拡張生成(Retrieval-Augmented Generation, RAG)×質問応答 (QA)×
分野テキストマイニングテキストマイニング
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2020
提唱者Lewis, Patrick et al. (Meta AI / Facebook AI Research)
種類Hybrid retrieval + generation pipelineNLP text-comprehension task
原典Lewis, P. et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 9459-9474. DOI ↗Rajpurkar, P. et al. (2016). SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text. EMNLP. DOI ↗
別名RAG, retrieval-augmented LLM, grounded generation, Erişim Destekli Metin Üretimi (RAG)QA, machine reading comprehension, Soru Cevaplama (Question Answering)
関連74
概要Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a natural-language-processing pipeline introduced by Lewis et al. in 2020 that strengthens a large language model (LLM) with evidence fetched at inference time from an external knowledge base. Instead of relying solely on what a model memorised during training, RAG first retrieves the most relevant passages from a document index and then hands those passages to the LLM as context, grounding the generated answer in verifiable, up-to-date information. The approach reduces hallucination and allows domain-specific or time-sensitive knowledge to be injected without retraining the model.Question answering is a natural-language-processing task that automatically answers natural-language questions grounded in a given context passage, using either extractive or generative approaches. The task was crystallised by the SQuAD benchmark of Rajpurkar et al. (2016), and later models such as XLNet (Yang et al., 2019) pushed reading-comprehension accuracy higher.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Retrieval-Augmented Generation · Question Answering. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare