手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 検索拡張生成(Retrieval-Augmented Generation, RAG)× | 質問応答 (QA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | テキストマイニング | テキストマイニング |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2020 | — |
| 提唱者≠ | Lewis, Patrick et al. (Meta AI / Facebook AI Research) | — |
| 種類≠ | Hybrid retrieval + generation pipeline | NLP text-comprehension task |
| 原典≠ | Lewis, P. et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 9459-9474. DOI ↗ | Rajpurkar, P. et al. (2016). SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text. EMNLP. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | RAG, retrieval-augmented LLM, grounded generation, Erişim Destekli Metin Üretimi (RAG) | QA, machine reading comprehension, Soru Cevaplama (Question Answering) |
| 関連≠ | 7 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a natural-language-processing pipeline introduced by Lewis et al. in 2020 that strengthens a large language model (LLM) with evidence fetched at inference time from an external knowledge base. Instead of relying solely on what a model memorised during training, RAG first retrieves the most relevant passages from a document index and then hands those passages to the LLM as context, grounding the generated answer in verifiable, up-to-date information. The approach reduces hallucination and allows domain-specific or time-sensitive knowledge to be injected without retraining the model. | Question answering is a natural-language-processing task that automatically answers natural-language questions grounded in a given context passage, using either extractive or generative approaches. The task was crystallised by the SQuAD benchmark of Rajpurkar et al. (2016), and later models such as XLNet (Yang et al., 2019) pushed reading-comprehension accuracy higher. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|