ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Recall (感度)×Balanced Accuracy×マシューズ相関係数 (Matthews Correlation Coefficient)×
分野モデル評価モデル評価モデル評価
系統MCDMMCDMMCDM
提唱年20th century20101975
提唱者Historical statistical foundationsBrodersen, Ong, Stephan, and BuhmannBrian W. Matthews
種類Evaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
原典Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗
別名Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPRAverage Recall, Equal-weight Average SensitivityPhi Coefficient, Binary Classification Correlation
関連555
概要Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly.Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset.The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Recall (Sensitivity) · Balanced Accuracy · Matthews Correlation Coefficient. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare