手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 質的優位型多層次混合研究法デザイン× | 質的優先混合研究法デザイン× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究デザイン | 研究デザイン |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| 提唱者≠ | Tashakkori & Teddlie; Leech & Onwuegbuzie | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 種類 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 原典≠ | Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 別名 | QUAL-dominant multilevel MMR, qualitative-priority multilevel mixed methods, qual-dominant nested multilevel design, QUAL+quan multilevel design | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Qualitative-dominant multilevel mixed methods design addresses research questions nested across two or more social levels — such as individuals within classrooms within schools — while assigning primary inferential weight to the qualitative strand. Quantitative data collected at one or more levels serve a supporting role: they contextualize, corroborate, or sharpen qualitative findings rather than generate the principal conclusions. The design is especially productive when understanding processes and meanings at multiple organizational layers is more important than population-level statistical estimates. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|