ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

前向き診断精度研究×スクリーニング検査評価×
分野疫学疫学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年Formalized 2000s; practice dates to mid-20th century1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
提唱者Established through STARD initiative (Bossuyt, Reitsma et al., 2000s)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
種類Observational / evaluative study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
原典Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., ... & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
別名prospective DTA study, prospective test accuracy study, forward-looking diagnostic study, prospective index test evaluationscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
関連66
概要A prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolls participants before any test results are known and follows them forward in time to evaluate how well an index test (the test under evaluation) distinguishes individuals with and without a target condition, using a reference standard applied independently. Key accuracy metrics include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the area under the ROC curve. The prospective design reduces many biases inherent in retrospective test evaluations.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Screening Test Evaluation. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare