ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多カテゴリ項目測定不変性×多群同時確認的因子分析(MG-CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年2000–20041971
提唱者Roger E. Millsap, Robert J. VandenbergKarl Jöreskog
種類Multi-group confirmatory testMeasurement model / invariance test
原典Millsap, R. E. & Kwok, O.-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factor loading and intercept invariance on selection utility. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 200–215. link ↗Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
別名PMI, ordinal measurement invariance, polytomous factorial invariance, polytomous multi-group measurement invarianceMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
関連56
概要Polytomous measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a scale with ordered categorical (polytomous) response options — such as Likert-type items — measures the same latent construct in the same way across two or more groups. It extends classical multi-group CFA invariance testing to properly account for the ordinal nature of item responses, ensuring that group comparisons of latent means or factor structures are substantively valid.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Polytomous Measurement Invariance · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare