ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

政策評価における傾向スコア重み付け×傾向スコアマッチング×
分野因果推論研究統計
系統Regression modelProcess / pipeline
提唱年1983/20031983
提唱者Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); extended to policy evaluation by Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
種類Quasi-experimental causal inferenceMethod
原典Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
別名PSW policy evaluation, inverse probability weighting for policy, IPW policy evaluation, policy PSWPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
関連63
概要Policy evaluation propensity score weighting applies inverse-probability weighting to observational data to estimate the causal effect of a policy program. By reweighting participants and non-participants so they resemble a target population, it removes selection bias from voluntary or administratively allocated program assignment without requiring randomization.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Matching. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare