ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

政策評価における傾向スコア重み付け×逆確率重み付け法 (IPW / IPTW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1983/20032000
提唱者Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); extended to policy evaluation by Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
種類Quasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference weighting estimator
原典Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
別名PSW policy evaluation, inverse probability weighting for policy, IPW policy evaluation, policy PSWIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
関連65
概要Policy evaluation propensity score weighting applies inverse-probability weighting to observational data to estimate the causal effect of a policy program. By reweighting participants and non-participants so they resemble a target population, it removes selection bias from voluntary or administratively allocated program assignment without requiring randomization.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Weighting · Inverse Probability Weighting. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare