手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 政策評価における傾向スコアマッチング× | 粗化完全マッチング(CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 1983; policy evaluation adaptation 1997 | 2011-2012 |
| 提唱者≠ | Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation application | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| 種類≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator | Matching / causal inference |
| 原典≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | PSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluation | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Policy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment. | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|