ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

政策評価における逆確率重み付け×逆確率重み付け法 (IPW / IPTW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1952 (IPW origin); 2000s (policy evaluation application)2000
提唱者Horvitz & Thompson (1952); extended to causal policy settings by Robins, Hernan & Brumback (2000) and Imbens & Wooldridge (2009)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
種類Reweighting estimator for causal policy analysisCausal inference weighting estimator
原典Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
別名IPW policy evaluation, propensity-weighted policy analysis, inverse probability of treatment weightingIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
関連65
概要Policy evaluation inverse probability weighting (IPW) uses estimated propensity scores to reweight observed units so that the weighted sample mimics a randomised experiment. Each unit is weighted by the inverse of its probability of receiving the policy, creating a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of observed covariates and the average treatment effect (ATE) can be read off directly.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Policy Evaluation Inverse Probability Weighting · Inverse Probability Weighting. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare