ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

政策評価のための介入時系列分析×政策評価における差の差分析×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1975 (intervention analysis); 2000s–2010s (policy evaluation framing)1978-2009
提唱者Box & Tiao (1975); popularised for policy by Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002) and Bernal et al. (2017)Ashenfelter (1978); Heckman, LaLonde & Smith (1999); Imbens & Wooldridge (2009)
種類Quasi-experimental causal designQuasi-experimental / policy evaluation
原典Bernal, J. L., Cummins, S., & Gasparrini, A. (2017). Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(1), 348-355. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI ↗
別名ITS for policy evaluation, policy ITS, segmented regression for policy, policy impact ITSpolicy DiD, program evaluation DiD, policy impact DiD, DiD policy assessment
関連44
概要Interrupted Time Series (ITS) for policy evaluation uses routinely collected aggregate time-series data to estimate the causal impact of a policy change. A segmented regression model splits the series at a known intervention date, estimating both an immediate level shift and a change in trend attributable to the policy — without requiring a randomised control group.Policy Evaluation DiD applies the difference-in-differences estimator specifically to assess the causal impact of government programs, regulations, or policy reforms. It compares outcome changes in a group exposed to the policy against a comparable untreated group, before and after the policy took effect, isolating the net policy effect from pre-existing trends and time-common shocks.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Policy Evaluation Interrupted Time Series · Policy Evaluation Difference-in-Differences. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare