手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| CEMによる政策評価× | エントロピー・バランシング× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2011-2012 | 2012 |
| 提唱者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro | Jens Hainmueller |
| 種類≠ | Matching / quasi-experimental design | Covariate-balancing reweighting |
| 原典≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | CEM, Coarsened Exact Matching, CEM policy evaluation, coarsening-based matching | EB, entropy reweighting, covariate balancing via entropy, Hainmueller balancing |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) is a quasi-experimental causal-inference technique that creates balanced treatment and control groups from observational data by temporarily coarsening covariates into bins, exactly matching units within those bins, and then pruning unmatched observations before estimating policy effects. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro, CEM belongs to the monotonic imbalance bounding family of matching methods and is especially popular in policy evaluation. | Entropy balancing is a preprocessing method for causal inference that assigns weights to control-group units so that the reweighted control sample matches the treatment group exactly on a chosen set of covariate moments (means, variances, skewness). Introduced by Hainmueller (2012), it replaces trial-and-error propensity-score trimming with a constrained maximum-entropy optimisation that achieves balance in a single step. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|