ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

順序尺度 nomological validity×構成概念妥当性(Nomological Validity)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present1955
提唱者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometricsLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類Validity assessmentValidity evidence framework
原典Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
別名nomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validitynomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity
関連56
概要Ordinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement.Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Ordinal Nomological Validity · Nomological Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare