ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

帰無仮説検定×Confidence Interval×
分野研究統計研究統計
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19251937
提唱者Ronald Fisher; Neyman & PearsonJerzy Neyman
種類ConceptConcept
原典Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd. link ↗Neyman, J. (1937). Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 236, 333–380. DOI ↗
別名NHST, hypothesis formulation, null hypothesis, alternative hypothesisCI, 95% CI, credible interval, interval estimate
関連44
概要Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) is the dominant statistical framework in empirical research. The null hypothesis (H₀) represents the default assumption—typically 'no effect' or 'no difference'—while the alternative hypothesis (H₁) represents the claim being tested. The test calculates the probability of observing the data given H₀ is true (p-value); if p is very small, H₀ is rejected in favor of H₁. Formulated by Ronald Fisher and extended by Neyman and Pearson in the early 20th century, NHST is foundational to confirmatory research but has been widely critiqued for misuse and misinterpretation.A confidence interval (CI) is a range of values, calculated from sample data, that likely contains the true population parameter. Introduced by Jerzy Neyman in 1937, it provides an interval estimate rather than a single point estimate, incorporating both the observed value and the uncertainty around it. The standard 95% confidence interval is a robust, intuitive alternative to p-values for communicating research results.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Null Hypothesis Testing · Confidence Interval. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare