ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

構造化合意形成手法としてのナショナル・グループ・テクニック(NGT)×アクションリサーチ×コンテンツ分析×Delphi Method×
分野質的手法質的研究質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19711946Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181963
提唱者André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchNorman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation)
種類Qualitative research methodMethodQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueStructured iterative expert-elicitation process
原典Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. DOI ↗
別名NGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiryİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisDelphi Yöntemi, Delphi technique, expert consensus method
関連6155
概要The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.The Delphi method is a structured, iterative survey technique developed by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer at the RAND Corporation in 1963 for eliciting and converging expert opinion on complex topics where empirical data are unavailable or insufficient. It collects independent judgements from a geographically dispersed expert panel over multiple anonymous rounds, feeding aggregated results back to participants after each round so they can revise their views in light of the group's collective position.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Nominal Group Technique · Action Research · Content Analysis · Delphi Method. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare