ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

構造化合意形成手法としてのナショナル・グループ・テクニック(NGT)×アクションリサーチ×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19711946
提唱者André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
種類Qualitative research methodMethod
原典Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
別名NGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
関連61
概要The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Nominal Group Technique · Action Research. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare