手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 観察研究の質評価のためのNewcastle-Ottawa Scale× | STROBEチェックリスト：観察研究の報告基準× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究方法論 | 研究方法論 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000 | 2007 |
| 提唱者≠ | Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute) | Von Elm et al. (STROBE Group) |
| 種類≠ | Research team assessment | Study author reporting checklist |
| 原典≠ | Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. link ↗ | Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | NOS | STROBE |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses. | STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) is a 22-item evidence-based checklist published in 2007 by Von Elm et al. to improve the quality of reporting of cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional observational studies. Like CONSORT for RCTs, STROBE is endorsed by over 300 journals and is widely considered the reporting standard for observational epidemiological research. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|