手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ムンドラック・チェンバレン相関ランダム効果× | ハウスマンの仕様検定(固定効果モデル vs. 混合効果モデル)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 計量経済学 | 計量経済学 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年 | 1978 | 1978 |
| 提唱者≠ | Yair Mundlak; Gary Chamberlain | Jerry A. Hausman |
| 種類≠ | Panel data estimator | Specification test for panel data models |
| 原典≠ | Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85. DOI ↗ | Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | Correlated Random Effects, CRE Estimator, Mundlak Device, Korelasyonlu Rassal Etkiler | Hausman specification test, FE vs RE test, Durbin-Wu-Hausman test, Hausman Spesifikasyon Testi (FE vs RE) |
| 関連≠ | 2 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | The Mundlak-Chamberlain correlated random effects (CRE) estimator, introduced by Mundlak (1978) and extended by Chamberlain (1982), is a panel data technique that reconciles the fixed effects and random effects approaches by explicitly modelling the correlation between unobserved individual heterogeneity and the observed regressors. By including within-group means of time-varying covariates as additional regressors in a random effects framework, CRE yields estimates numerically equivalent to the within (fixed effects) estimator while permitting identification of time-invariant variables. | The Hausman test is a specification test, introduced by Jerry A. Hausman in 1978, that decides between the fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) estimators in panel data models. The null hypothesis is that the random-effects estimator is consistent and efficient and should be preferred; the alternative is that random effects is inconsistent and fixed effects is required because the unit-specific effects are correlated with the explanatory variables. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|