手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 多レベル再検査信頼性× | 一般化可能性理論(G理論)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1979 (ICC foundation); multilevel extension: 1990s–2000s | 1963–1972 |
| 提唱者≠ | Shrout & Fleiss (ICC foundation); multilevel extension by Goldstein, Snijders, and others | Lee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam |
| 種類≠ | Reliability estimation under hierarchical data | Variance-components reliability model |
| 原典≠ | Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | hierarchical test-retest reliability, multilevel ICC reliability, nested test-retest reliability, ML-TRT reliability | G-theory, G-study / D-study framework, variance components reliability |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Multilevel test-retest reliability estimates how consistently a measurement instrument produces the same scores across repeated administrations when observations are nested within higher-level units — such as patients within clinics or students within classrooms. It partitions total score variance across levels using intraclass correlation coefficients derived from multilevel models. | Generalizability Theory is a psychometric framework that decomposes observed score variance into multiple sources — persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — using analysis of variance. It replaces the single reliability coefficient of classical test theory with a family of coefficients that tell researchers how well scores generalize across different measurement conditions. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|