手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 多層階層的項目機能差（多層階層的DIF）× | 項目応答理論における項目特性曲線（ICC）の差× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 2001 | 1970s–1993 |
| 提唱者≠ | Kamata (2001) and subsequent multilevel IRT/DIF literature | William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & Wainer |
| 種類≠ | Bias detection / multilevel measurement model | Item-level bias detection |
| 原典≠ | French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: Locating the invariant referent sets. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 96–113. DOI ↗ | Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589 |
| 別名 | multilevel DIF, hierarchical DIF analysis, cross-level DIF, ML-DIF | DIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement bias |
| 関連 | 5 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Multilevel DIF analysis detects whether individual test or survey items function differently across groups when respondents are clustered within higher-level units — such as students nested in schools, employees in organizations, or patients in clinics. By accounting for hierarchical data structure, it separates genuine item bias from artificial DIF signals caused by ignoring clustering. | Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|