ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多群項目分析×多群同時確認的因子分析(MG-CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19861971
提唱者Classical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986)Karl Jöreskog
種類Comparative item-level analysisMeasurement model / invariance test
原典Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
別名MGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysisMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
関連66
概要Multi-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multi-group item analysis · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare