ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多群項目分析×項目応答理論 (IRT)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19861952–1968
提唱者Classical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986)Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
種類Comparative item-level analysisProbabilistic measurement model
原典Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
別名MGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysisIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
関連65
概要Multi-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multi-group item analysis · Item Response Theory. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare