ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多群一般化理論×多群準則モデル (Multi-group Rasch Model)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1963–20011960 (Rasch); 1980s–1990s (multi-group extensions)
提唱者Lee J. Cronbach and colleagues (Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, Rajaratnam), extended to multi-group contexts by Brennan and othersGeorg Rasch (single-group); extended to multi-group applications by Fischer, Molenaar, and others
種類Variance component / reliability generalizationItem response model / measurement invariance test
原典Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability Theory. Springer. ISBN: 978-0387952826Fischer, G. H. & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.) (1995). Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. Springer. ISBN: 978-0387944296
別名MG G-theory, multi-group G-theory, generalizability theory across groups, cross-group G-studyMG-Rasch, Rasch measurement invariance, multi-group 1PL IRT, cross-group Rasch analysis
関連66
概要Multi-group generalizability theory (MG G-theory) extends classical generalizability theory to estimate and compare variance components — attributable to persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — simultaneously across two or more defined groups. It reveals whether a measurement procedure is equally reliable and generalizable for every group studied, supporting fair and equitable score interpretation.The multi-group Rasch model fits the one-parameter logistic item response model simultaneously across two or more distinct groups, testing whether item difficulty parameters are invariant across groups. It is the primary psychometric tool for establishing that a scale measures the same latent trait with the same metric in each group, a prerequisite for meaningful score comparisons.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multi-group Generalizability Theory · Multi-group Rasch model. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare