手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| マルチグループ収束的妥当性× | 多群同時確認的因子分析(MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1981 / 2000 | 1971 |
| 提唱者≠ | Fornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension) | Karl Jöreskog |
| 種類≠ | Validity assessment procedure | Measurement model / invariance test |
| 原典≠ | Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | cross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groups | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Multi-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|