ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

マルチグループ収束的妥当性×多群同時確認的因子分析(MG-CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1981 / 20001971
提唱者Fornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension)Karl Jöreskog
種類Validity assessment procedureMeasurement model / invariance test
原典Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
別名cross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groupsMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
関連66
概要Multi-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multi-group convergent validity · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare